FORE: There is also a fourth consequence of the above principles: that the right to interpret penal laws cannot possibly rest with the criminal judges, for the[126] very reason that they are not legislators. The judges have not received the laws from our ancestors as a family tradition, as a legacy that only left to posterity the duty of obeying them, but they receive them from living society, or from the sovereign that represents it and is the lawful trustee of the actual result of mens collective wills; they receive them, not as obligations arising from an ancient oath[65] (null, because it bound wills not then in existence, and iniquitous, because it reduced men from a state of society to that of a flock), but as the result of the tacit or expressed oath made to the sovereign by the united wills of living subjects, as chains necessary for curbing and regulating the disorders caused by private interests. This is the natural and real source of the authority of the laws.
FORE:It would, therefore, be a mistake to ascribe to one, who only discusses social conventions and their consequences, principles contrary either to natural law or to revelation, for the reason that he does not discuss them. It would be a mistake, when he speaks of a state of war as anterior to a state of society, to understand it in the sense of Hobbes, as meaning that no obligation nor duty is prior to the existence of society, instead of understanding it as a fact due to the corruption of human nature and the want of any expressed sanction. It would be a mistake to impute it as a fault to a writer who is considering the results of the social compact[115] that he does not admit them as pre-existent to the formation of the compact itself.The aim of punishment is not to torment sensitive beings.
FORE:CHAPTER XVIII. INFAMY.Need it be said that the House of Lords paused, as they were entreated to do, and that they paused and paused again, in a manner more suggestive of the full stop than the comma, generally out of deference to the same authority? Romilly was indignant that so many prelates voted against his bills; but could they have done otherwise, when the best legal authorities in England urged that it would be fatal to vote for them?when they were gravely told that if a certain bill passed, they would not know whether they stood on their heads or on their feet?
FORE:The greatest effect that any punishment has upon the human mind is not to be measured by its intensity but by its duration, for our sensibility is more easily and permanently affected by very slight but repeated impressions than by a strong but brief shock. Habit holds universal sway over every sentient being, and as we speak and walk and satisfy our needs by its aid, so moral ideas only stamp themselves on our mind by long and repeated impressions. It is not the terrible yet brief sight of a criminals death, but the long and painful example of a man deprived of[172] his liberty, who, having become as it were a beast of burthen, repays with his toil the society he has offended, which is the strongest restraint from crimes. Far more potent than the fear of death, which men ever have before their eyes in the remote distance, is the thought, so efficacious from its constant recurrence: I myself shall be reduced to as long and miserable a condition if I commit similar misdeeds.Torture, again, is inflicted upon an accused man in order to discover his accomplices in crime. But if it is proved that it is not a fitting method for the discovery of truth, how will it serve to disclose accomplices, which is part of the truth to be discovered? As if a man who accuses himself would not more readily accuse others. And is it just to torment men for the crimes of others? Will not the accomplices be disclosed from the examination of the witnesses and of the accused, from the proofs and whole circumstances of the crime; in sum, from all those very means which should serve to convict the accused himself of guilt? Accomplices generally fly immediately after the capture of a companion; the uncertainty[155] of their lot of itself condemns them to exile, and frees the country from the danger of fresh offences from them; whilst the punishment of the criminal who is caught attains its precise object, namely, the averting of other men by terror from a similar crime.
FORE:CHAPTER XVII. BANISHMENT AND CONFISCATIONS.
FORE:To combine the maximum of perspicuity with the maximum of fidelity to the original has been the cardinal principle observed in the translation. But it would, of course, have been no less impossible than contrary to the spirit of the original to have attempted to render perfectly comprehensible what the author purposely wrapped in obscurity. A translation can but follow the lights and shades of the surface it reflects, rendering clear what is clear in the original, and opaque what is opaque.
| # |
项目名称 |
开始时间 |
结束时间 |
状态 |
责任人 |
| 1 |
Adminto Admin v1 |
01/01/2016 |
26/04/2016 |
已发布 |
Coderthemes |
| 2 |
Adminto Frontend v1 |
01/01/2016 |
26/04/2016 |
已发布 |
Adminto admin |
| 3 |
Adminto Admin v1.1 |
01/05/2016 |
10/05/2016 |
未开展 |
Coderthemes |
| 4 |
Adminto Frontend v1.1 |
01/01/2016 |
31/05/2016 |
进行中
|
Adminto admin |
| 5 |
Adminto Admin v1.3 |
01/01/2016 |
31/05/2016 |
即将开始 |
Coderthemes |
| 6 |
Adminto Admin v1.3 |
01/01/2016 |
31/05/2016 |
即将开始 |
Adminto admin |
| 7 |
Adminto Admin v1.3 |
01/01/2016 |
31/05/2016 |
即将开始 |
Adminto admin |
日本老教授老婆三级_日本老湿三级_日本老牌三级男演员_日本老牛吃嫩草类三级收集自
日本老教授老婆三级_日本老湿三级_日本老牌三级男演员_日本老牛吃嫩草类三级之家 - More Templates
日本老教授老婆三级_日本老湿三级_日本老牌三级男演员_日本老牛吃嫩草类三级